MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BOOK REVIEW

2005· article· en· W4239774680 on OpenAlexaff
G. H. Sperber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anatomy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wolf-Heidegger's Atlas of Human Anatomy , 6th edn . Volumes 1 and 2. Vol. 1 : Systemic Anatomy, Body Wall, Upper and Lower Limbs . Pp. xii + 353 . 643 figures (510 in colour). Vol. 2: Head and Neck, Thorax, Abdomen, Pelvis, Central Nervous System, Eye, Ear . Pp. xiv + 493 . 927 Figures (736 in colour). Index to Volumes 1 and 2 (39 pages) . By Petra Köpf-Maier . Basel : Karger . ISBN 3-8055-7669-2 . 2005 . CHF 150-/USD136.50 . With the resources now available for learning anatomy by interactive computer models accessible with online websites (Kim et al. 2003; http://www.aip.org/dbis), the need for atlases of human anatomy would appear to become increasingly redundant. The demise of anatomy as a moribund subject of study is thankfully resurrected by the aesthetic artistry inherent in anatomical atlases. Indeed, the tribute paid on the opening page of this atlas: ‘Hic locus est ubi mors gaudet succurrere vitae’[Here is the place where death delights in resuscitating life (inscription above the Anatomical Theatre of Bologna)] revives the roots of anatomical studies. The advent of the 6th edition of this well-established atlas is indicative of its previous success, and this new edition surpasses its predecessors (reviewed in the Journal of Anatomy197: 514–515, 2000). The author successfully correlates the classical representation of anatomical drawings with the new demands of ‘imaging’ practice created by the technologies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized axial tomography (CAT) and radiography. The combination of juxtaposed photographs, diagrams, radiographs, CAT scans, MRI tomograms, ultrasonographs and radioactive scintigraphs makes this atlas eminently suitable for clinicians as well as academic anatomists. A pertinent addendum to most drawings is a scale size, in percentages, relative to the actual size of adult specimens. The scant text, with American spelling, utilizes the Terminologica Anatomica, with synonyms and eponymous appelations that emphasizes the historical origins of anatomy's pioneers. A detailed index of eponyms, revealing the historiography of early anatomists will delight historians of anatomy. This set of atlases deserves to join the pantheon of illustrious treatises depicting human anatomy on the websites devoted to iconographic classic historical anatomy atlases (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/historicalanatomies/home.html and http://link.library.utoronto.ca/anatomia/application/index.cfm). The publisher has done full justice to the contents by printing on acid-free glossy paper, which, together with the hard covers of two books, weighs in at a hefty eight pounds. These volumes are unquestionably worth their relatively modest price and are a bibliophile's delight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AnatomySame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207