MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239790441 · doi:10.3917/idee.166.0059

Qu'est-ce qu'un conflit ethnique ?

2011· article· fr· W4239790441 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. J. Hobsbawm

Bibliographic record

VenueIdées économiques et sociales · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les élections fédérales belges de juin 2010 ont vu les indépendantistes flamands de la N-VA devenir le premier parti de Belgique. Mais à l’inverse, lors des élections fédérales canadiennes de mai 2011, les souverainistes du Bloc québécois ont subi une défaite historique, en ne parvenant à sauver qu’une poignée de députés à Ottawa. Le nouveau programme de Première demande de réfléchir sur la différence entre l’État et la nation. En France, les deux notions peuvent d’autant plus facilement être confondues que le pays revendique une certaine homogénéité culturelle. Mais comme le rappelle l’historien britannique E. Hobsbawm, dans un article [1] écrit dans le contexte du conflit yougoslave (1991-1995), les États monoethniques sont l’exception et les mouvements ethniques demandent souvent autre chose qu’une sécession territoriale d’un État : autonomie politique, lutte contre les discriminations...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.476
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.034 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIdées économiques et socialesSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207