Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the single-instruction multiple-threads (SIMT) execution model, small groups of scalar threads operate in lockstep. Within each group, current SIMT hardware implementations serialize the execution of threads that follow different paths, and to ensure efficiency, revert to lockstep execution as soon as possible. These constraints must be considered when adapting algorithms that employ synchronization. A deadlock-free program on a multiple-instruction multiple-data (MIMD) architecture may deadlock on a SIMT machine. To avoid this, programmers need to restructure control flow with SIMT scheduling constraints in mind. This requires programmers to be familiar with the underlying SIMT hardware. In this paper, we propose a static analysis technique that detects SIMT deadlocks by inspecting the application control flow graph (CFG). We further propose a CFG transformation that avoids SIMT deadlocks when synchronization is local to a function. Both the analysis and the transformation algorithms are implemented as LLVM compiler passes. Finally, we propose an adaptive hardware reconvergence mechanism that supports MIMD synchronization without changing the application CFG, but which can leverage our compiler analysis to gain efficiency. The static detection has a false detection rate of only 4%-5%. The automated transformation has an average performance overhead of 8.2%-10.9% compared to manual transformation. Our hardware approach performs on par with the compiler transformation, however, it avoids synchronization scope limitations, static instruction and register overheads, and debuggability challenges that are present in the compiler only solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".