MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239874145 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.647

The deep vein thrombosis caused by lymphocele after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection

2013· article· en· W4239874145 on OpenAlex
Seung Chol Park, Jea Whan Lee, Soon-A Park, Young Hwan Lee, Byung-Jun So, Joung Sik Rim

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWonkwang University
KeywordsLymphoceleMedicineProstatectomyDissection (medical)Lymph nodeSurgeryVenous thrombosisThrombosisDeep veinTrendelenburg positionLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyProstate cancerRadiologyCancerComplicationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pelvic lymphocele is a postoperative complications than can resultafter endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelviclymph node dissection. Radical prostatectomy have many risk factorsof deep vein thrombosis including location of target organ,malignancy, old age, Trendelenburg position, pelvic lymph nodedissection, and long procedure time. A 57-year-old man with alocalized prostate cancer was treated with endoscopic extraperitonealradical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Deepvein thrombosis was detected as a first sign of pelvic lymphocele.Lymphocele was managed with a percutaneous drainage withoutsclerosant. We report a case of deep vein thrombosis due to pelviclymphocele after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it