MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239956426 · doi:10.4324/9780429037399-53

Surrogacy

2019· book-chapter· en· W4239956426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Purdy, Helen Holmes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surrogate&s;s egg is fertilized by artificial insemination with sperm from the partner of the woman who hopes to gestate the embryo and raise the child. Low-tech surrogacy requires only that the woman&s;s fertile period be determined and that she be inseminated with viable sperm. In 1986 in Beverly Hills, California, the Center for Surrogate Parenting, with several satisfied surrogate mothers, launched the National Association of Surrogate Mothers. Surrogacy can provide babies for men without access to a woman and for women who are infertile or unwilling to undergo pregnancy. Surrogacy raises many overlapping issues regarding potential harm to children, to the family, to society at large, and to women in particular. Some have attempted to replace "surrogate" and "surrogacy" with other terms, such as "contract pregnancy," "intrauterine adoption," and, as in the report of the Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, "preconception arrangements."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207