MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239960396 · doi:10.1017/s0022109000003847

JFQ volume 39 issue 1 Front matter

2004· article· en· W4239960396 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vicentiu Covrig, Buen Sin Low, Michael Melvin, Hendrik Bessembinder, Stephen J. Brown, Paul Malatesta, Jonathan M. Karpoff, Warren Bailey, Geert Bekaert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignYork UniversityArizona State UniversityNorthwestern UniversityOhio State UniversityYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of OregonPurdue UniversityWashington University in St. LouisUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of WashingtonBoston College
KeywordsFront (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207