MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239997628 · doi:10.4000/books.pupvd.7453

La réhabilitation du campus principal de l’Illinois Institute of Technology

2014· book-chapter· fr· W4239997628 on OpenAlexaff
France Vanlaethem

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFacilities and Workplace Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabilitationLibrary sciencePolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le campus principal de l’Illinois Institute of Technology à Chicago est emblématique à plusieurs égards. Par rapport à l’histoire, le plan directeur approuvé en 1941 est la première commande reçue par l’architecte Ludwig Mies van Rohe installé depuis peu aux États-Unis, où sa réputation de « pionnier » de l’architecture moderne avait été établie par le Musée d’art moderne (MOMA). Par ailleurs, l’ensemble dont la construction fut amorcée avec le chantier du pavillon de la recherche sur les mé...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooksSame topicFacilities and Workplace ManagementFrench-language works237,207