MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240005195 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14647944

3D Shape Estimation Of Tendon-Driven Catheters Using Ultrasound Imaging

2021· preprint· en· W4240005195 on OpenAlexaff
Niloufaralsadat Hashemi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterComputer scienceUltrasoundFilter (signal processing)Calibration3D ultrasoundTendonUltrasound imagingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAcousticsMedicinePhysicsSurgeryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active cable/tendon-driven catheters are becoming an established part of the minimally invasive surgical procedures. Therefore, there has been growing interest in literature in estimating the shape of their distal end especially using clinical ultrasound (US) imaging systems. The purpose of this thesis is to use a B-mode US imaging system to design time-efficient, accurate and robust algorithm for 3D shape estimation of tendon-driven catheters. Kalman filter (KF), Adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) and Particle filter (PF) algorithms were developed for this purpose. First, they were applied to a series of simulated US B-mode images where AKF provided the best estimate (error: 0.2 ± 0.1 mm). Second, they were applied to a series of experimentally obtained US B-mode images. Calibration procedures were carried out to calibrate these US images in the experiment’s workspace. The PF was shown to provide the best 3D shape estimate (error: 8.6 ± 0.1 mm). However, since almost the same accuracy could be achieved with AKF in ten times less computational time, AKF was concluded to be the best method, in terms of accuracy and efficiency, to estimate the 3D shape of tendon-driven catheters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207