MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240031668 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-xb970

Direct Observations of Anthracene Clusters at Ice Surfaces

2021· preprint· en· W4240031668 on OpenAlexafffund
Subha Chakraborty, Annastacia D. Stubbs, Tara F. Kahan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSnowAnthraceneCryospherePhotodegradationChemistryEnvironmental chemistryChemical physicsEnvironmental scienceSea icePhotochemistryGeologyClimatologyGeomorphologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterogeneous processes can control atmospheric composition. Snow and ice present important, but poorly understood, reaction media that can greatly alter the composition of air in the cryosphere in polar and temperate regions. Atmospheric scientists struggle to reconcile model predictions with field observations in snow-covered regions due to experimental challenges associated with monitoring reactions at air-ice interfaces, and debate regarding reaction kinetics and mechanisms has persisted for over a decade. In this work, we use wavelength-resolved fluorescence microscopy to determine the distribution and chemical speciation of the pollutant anthracene at the surfaces of environmentally relevant frozen surfaces. We show that anthracene adsorbs to frozen surfaces in monomeric form, but that following lateral diffusion, molecules ultimately reside within brine channels at saltwater ice surfaces, and in micron-sized clusters at freshwater ice surfaces; emission profiles indicate extensive self-association. We also measure anthracene photodegradation kinetics in aqueous solution and artificial snow prepared from frozen freshwater and saltwater solutions and use the micro-spectroscopic observations to explain the rate constants measured in different environments. These results resolve long-standing debates and will improve predictions of pollutant fate in the cryosphere. The techniques used can be applied to numerous surfaces within and beyond the atmospheric sciences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxiv→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→