MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240077668 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db236453

Parts of Greek economy will be unreformed post-bailout

2018· other· en· W4240077668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBailoutRecessionQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsProductivityPopulation ageingPopulationCapital (architecture)Government (linguistics)Balance (ability)Economic policyEconomyBusinessLabour economicsFinancial crisisEconomic growthMacroeconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Greece will re-enter international capital markets solely on the strength of its economy, after a near-decade-long recession that wiped out one-quarter of its output and left one-fifth of the working population unemployed. Although Greece turned a corner in 2017, with year-on-year growth that continued into the first quarter of 2018, the economy remains fragile and continuing reforms depend on the government’s willingness and ability to adhere to the reform agenda. Impacts The burden of non-performing loans on banks’ balance sheets (close to 50%) will constrain credit growth and slow down economic recovery. In the long term, an ageing population will weigh heavily on the public finances, complicating achieving agreed primary budget surpluses. A shift towards temporary and part-time employment will delay recovery in productivity levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207