MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240095364 · doi:10.5376/ijmec.2021.11.0003

Investigation and Analysis of Parasitic Characteristics of <i>Taxillus thibetensis</i> in Kunming Haikou Forest Farm

2021· article· en· W4240095364 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anpei Zhou, Zhiwei Jin, Ziguang Li, Yang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Ecology and Conservation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadratForestryHost (biology)ShrubDiameter at breast heightGeographyEcologyBiologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mistletoes (Loranthaceae) is well known as a common hemi-parasitic shrub and its excessive reproduction can limit the function of natural forest and plantation on ecology, economy and society. By investigation, mistletoes were found in some area of Kunming Haikou Forest Farm, and the main type is Taxillus thibetensis . To monitor the spread of parasite and understand the choice preference, our study had focused on the enrichment areas of T .  thibetensis in Kunming Haikou Forest Farm and conducted sample surveys from the center and four adjoining areas. The host selection of T. thibetensis  was investigated and the regression relation between parasitic intensity and host growth characteristics was constructed. The results showed that the quadrat Two (M2; enrichment center) characterized by minimum canopy density (30%) and maximum slope gradient had a serious damage, while a few influence was found in others four quadrats (M1, M3, M4, and M5; adjoining areas), suggesting an initial stage of parasite spread. T. thibetensis  showed a strong host selection and Quercus aliena was main host plants. There was no clear correlation between the spread of T. thibetensis  and proportion of  Q. aliena in community. The stepwise regression reveals the linear relationship between parasitic intensity and host characteristics. Crown width and diameter of Q. aliena  were introduced into regression model under corrected R 2  fitting of 0.526, and the equation was y=-0.467+0.152x 1 +0.110x 2 . The parasitic position of T. thibetensis  in M2 and M1 focused on the 40%~80% of host plants height, while the parasites were scattered over the trees in M3, M4 and M5. This work lays a scientific foundation for ecological control of T .  thibetensis .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular Ecology and ConservationSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207