Effect of pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound on the nerve compound action potential amplitude and conduction velocity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Therapeutic HIFU has been used as a non-invasive energy modality to compromise nerve function since the 1950s. Several contributions have been made in recent years to characterize these effects on nerve function. In this study, short repeated bursts of HIFU, termed as pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU), was directed at nerve tissue. The pHIFU transducer operated at a central frequency of 1.95 MHz and had a focal length of approximately 12 cm. The ventral nerve cord from the American Lobster (Homarus americanus), n=15, was sonicated cumulatively at 3 exposure times: 1s, 6s, and 16s, at an intensity of 1010 W/cm2, or focal pressure of 5.51 MPa. The compound action potential (CAP) and conduction velocity (CV) were seen to decrease as sonication exposure time to the nerve increased. The experiments performed demonstrate the feasibility to modulate nerve CAP and nerve CV using non-thermal mechanisms of ultrasound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".