MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240127661 · doi:10.1079/cabicomm-62-8148

MARA-CABI Joint Laboratory: 12 years of achievement

2021· report· en· W4240127661 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Min Wan, Julian Chen, Hongmei Li, Jinping Zhang, Bo Yuan, Qiaoqiao Zhang, Feng Zhang, Kongming Wu, Xue-Ping ZHOU, U. Kuhlmann, Asia Cabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentMinistry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of ChinaForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeIrish Aid
KeywordsJoint (building)Mathematics educationPsychologyEngineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) -CABI Joint Laboratory for Bio-safety (hereinafter "Joint Lab") was launched in 2008.Since its establishment, the Joint Lab has successfully led and/or implemented 32 international cooperation projects on research and technology transfer in the broad plant protection area.More than 80 Chinese and overseas organizations have participated in these projects, with a total funding of approximately US$ 33 million.After 12-years of operation, the Joint Lab is now widely regarded as one of the top platforms of its type within the Chinese agricultural research and development community.* The Belt and Road Initiative, proposed by Chinese government in 2013, is an economic framework designed to promote win-win cooperation and connect economies in Asia, Europe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207