MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240131154 · doi:10.22161/ijels.4.1.28

English as a Second Language

2019· article· en· W4240131154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Disha Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsComputer scienceHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English is spoken as a second language by many countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Shri Lanka, Nigeria and Tanzania.In these countries English is spoken as a non-native or second language, and used for various purposes official, educational, social and interpersonal.In the countries such as Russia, Japan, Germany, France and Italy, English is used as a foreign language.A second language is one which is used for various purposes within the country while a foreign language is used.In learning a second language we will find that vocabulary is comparatively easy.However, in some countries like the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Canada and Australia, English is native or first language.As we listen to a person speaking our native language we hear not only what is said but also certain things about the speaker.English is first, second or foreign language.Children learn native language from a very early age to respond to sounds and tunes which their elders habitually use in talking to them.Second language is generally learnt later in life.The second language is learnt after the child has mastered the first language, his/her learning of the second language is influenced by the first language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English Literature and Social SciencesSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207