MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Guidelines Section

2002· article· en· W4240156005 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John G. Bartlett

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterimVaccinationInfluenza vaccineFamily medicinePediatricsInterim analysisPharmacyEmergency medicineInternal medicineVirologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Influenza Guidelines: Prevention and Control of Influenza CDC,MMRW2003;52:RR-8: The major changes in the influenza guidelines as applied to adults are the following: Optimal time to vaccinate: The optimal time is October and November, but there have been distribution delays in the past that have led to preferential vaccination for high-risk patients during October with others to be vaccinate in November. The high risk group includes persons >50 years or 6-23 months, persons 2-49 years with high risk medical conditions, children <9 years receiving the initial vaccine, health care workers and household contacts of persons at high risk. The 2003-04 trivalent inactivated vaccine includes A/Moscow/10/99 (H3N2), A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and B/Hong Kong/330/2001. The US market will have vaccine available from two suppliers in 2003-04 compared to three in 2002-03. Comment: The reduction in suppliers represents the withdrawal of Wyeth, which is pursuing the intranasal influenza vaccine “FluMist” with Med Immune. The FDA approved this vaccine 6/17/03, but it is not mentioned in the CDC guidelines presumably due to timing. The FluMist indication is for healthy persons aged 5 to 49 years, the price is $46 per dose and the distribution system will include administration in pharmacies (Pink Sheet, June 5, 2003, p. 20). Updated Interim Surveillance Case Definition for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)—United States, April 29, 2003 CDC MMWR 2003;52:392: The following represents the updated interim US surveillance case definition of SARS: Clinical criteria Asymptomatic or mild respiratory illness Moderate respiratory illness - temperature of >100.4°F (>38°C), and - one or more clinical findings of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, or hypoxia). Severe respiratory illness - temperature of >100.4°F (>38°C), and - one or more clinical findings of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, or hypoxia), and - radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or - respiratory distress syndrome, or - autopsy findings consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome without an identifiable cause Epidemiologic criteria Travel (including transit in an airport) within 10 days of onset of symptoms to an area with current or recently documented or suspected community transmission of SARS (China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Toronto, Hanoi) Close contact (cared for or lived with) within 10 days of onset of symptoms with a person known or suspected to have SARS infection Laboratory criteria (EIA, IFA or RT-PCR) Confirmed - detection of antibody to SARS-CoV in specimens obtained during acute illness or >21 days after illness onset, or - detection of SARS-CoV RNA by RT-PCR confirmed by a second PCR assay, by using a second aliquot of the specimen and a different set of PCR primers or - isolation of SARS-CoV Negative - absence of antibody to SARS-CoV in convalescent serum obtained >21 days after symptom onset Undetermined: laboratory testing either not performed or incomplete Case classification Probable case; meets the clinical criteria for severe respiratory illness of unknown etiology with onset since February 1, 2003, and epidemiologic criteria; laboratory criteria confirmed, negative, or undermined Suspect case: meets the clinical criteria for moderate respiratory illness of unknown etiology with onset since February 1, 2003, and epidemiologic criteria; laboratory criteria confirmed, negative, or undetermined

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.127
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.127
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.298
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Diseases in Clinical PracticeSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207