Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influenza Guidelines: Prevention and Control of Influenza CDC,MMRW2003;52:RR-8: The major changes in the influenza guidelines as applied to adults are the following: Optimal time to vaccinate: The optimal time is October and November, but there have been distribution delays in the past that have led to preferential vaccination for high-risk patients during October with others to be vaccinate in November. The high risk group includes persons >50 years or 6-23 months, persons 2-49 years with high risk medical conditions, children <9 years receiving the initial vaccine, health care workers and household contacts of persons at high risk. The 2003-04 trivalent inactivated vaccine includes A/Moscow/10/99 (H3N2), A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and B/Hong Kong/330/2001. The US market will have vaccine available from two suppliers in 2003-04 compared to three in 2002-03. Comment: The reduction in suppliers represents the withdrawal of Wyeth, which is pursuing the intranasal influenza vaccine “FluMist” with Med Immune. The FDA approved this vaccine 6/17/03, but it is not mentioned in the CDC guidelines presumably due to timing. The FluMist indication is for healthy persons aged 5 to 49 years, the price is $46 per dose and the distribution system will include administration in pharmacies (Pink Sheet, June 5, 2003, p. 20). Updated Interim Surveillance Case Definition for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)—United States, April 29, 2003 CDC MMWR 2003;52:392: The following represents the updated interim US surveillance case definition of SARS: Clinical criteria Asymptomatic or mild respiratory illness Moderate respiratory illness - temperature of >100.4°F (>38°C), and - one or more clinical findings of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, or hypoxia). Severe respiratory illness - temperature of >100.4°F (>38°C), and - one or more clinical findings of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, or hypoxia), and - radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or - respiratory distress syndrome, or - autopsy findings consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome without an identifiable cause Epidemiologic criteria Travel (including transit in an airport) within 10 days of onset of symptoms to an area with current or recently documented or suspected community transmission of SARS (China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Toronto, Hanoi) Close contact (cared for or lived with) within 10 days of onset of symptoms with a person known or suspected to have SARS infection Laboratory criteria (EIA, IFA or RT-PCR) Confirmed - detection of antibody to SARS-CoV in specimens obtained during acute illness or >21 days after illness onset, or - detection of SARS-CoV RNA by RT-PCR confirmed by a second PCR assay, by using a second aliquot of the specimen and a different set of PCR primers or - isolation of SARS-CoV Negative - absence of antibody to SARS-CoV in convalescent serum obtained >21 days after symptom onset Undetermined: laboratory testing either not performed or incomplete Case classification Probable case; meets the clinical criteria for severe respiratory illness of unknown etiology with onset since February 1, 2003, and epidemiologic criteria; laboratory criteria confirmed, negative, or undermined Suspect case: meets the clinical criteria for moderate respiratory illness of unknown etiology with onset since February 1, 2003, and epidemiologic criteria; laboratory criteria confirmed, negative, or undetermined
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.127 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".