MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240157612 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q8bju

Bilingual toddlers' comprehension of mixed sentences is asymmetrical across their two languages

2019· preprint· en· W4240157612 on OpenAlex
Christine Potter, Eva Fourakis, Elizabeth Morin‐Lessard, Krista Byers‐Heinlein, Casey Lew‐Williams

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsComprehensionPsychologyNounNeuroscience of multilingualismComputer scienceFirst languageProcess (computing)Natural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tested Spanish-English bilingual toddlers’ processing of single-language and mixed-language sentences. Processing was disrupted when toddlers heard a heard a switch from their dominant to non-dominant language, but not vice versa, and they benefited from hearing nouns produced in their dominant language, independent of switching. These results suggest a united picture of early monolingual and bilingual learning: with experience, toddlers integrate knowledge of familiar regularities and representations of individual words to process language efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLanguage Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207