MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240200118 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.2850

Bibliographie

2016· book-chapter· fr· W4240200118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Je passe le test. Rapport d’étape, Montréal, 2007.Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Vers des services adaptés aux jeunes de 12 à 25 ans dans les CLSC de Montréal, Montréal, 2013.Alexy, R., Teoria dos direitos fundamentais, Sao Paulo, Malheiros, 2011.Anonyme, « Le manque de personnel persiste au CSSS », L’information du Nord Vallée de la Rouge, 12 novembre 2013.Arweiler, D. et Contandriopoulos, A.-P., « Le financeme...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0310.050
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4890.130

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks→Same topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→French-language works237,207→