MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240239426 · doi:10.1002/9780470750544.gloss

Glossary

2005· other· en· W4240239426 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Α. Gatzoulis, Lorna Swan, Judith Therrien, George A. Pantely

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlossaryLibrary scienceHistoryMedicineGerontologyArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this glossary is to help guide those reading and researching in the area of adult congenital heart disease.It is meant to be a living document, constantly under revision, improvement, correction, as you, its users, fi nd ways to ease the path for those who follow.To this end, if you cannot fi nd a term you think should be here, or if you disagree with a defi nition, or see a way to improve it, drop us an e-mail before you move on.We promise to consider all feedback carefully, and to make additions and revisions on the website (http://www.achd-library.com/)often.We hope you fi nd the glossary helpful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.020
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4060.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→