MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240245284 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(20)30137-8

Lanxess feels effect of global economic slump but ‘remains robust’

2020· article· en· W4240245284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditives for Polymers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFellSlumpQuarter (Canadian coin)Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortizationMargin (machine learning)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicEconomicsAgricultural economicsGeographyFinanceMedicineCartographyEarnings

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the second quarter of 2020, Cologne-based Lanxess recorded an expected but much more significant impact on its business results from the coronavirus pandemic than in the first three months of the year [ADPO, July 2020, p. 11]. Group sales totalled €1.436 billion, down 16.7% from €1.724 billion in 2Q 2019, while EBITDA pre-exceptionals fell by 20.3% year on year to €224 million. However, the associated margin was ‘almost stable’ at 15.6% versus 16.3% in 2Q 2019, the company says.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditives for PolymersSame topicDiverse Scientific Research in UkraineFrench-language works237,207