MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contio

2018· other· en· W4240250756 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Tracy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient History · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityDissentEmperorLawPolitical sciencePeriod (music)PluralMedia studiesHistorySociologyArtPoliticsAncient historyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The contio (plural: contiones ) could be civil or military. The civil contio was a non‐voting public meeting convened, during the republic, usually by a consul or tribune of the plebs, and, during the imperial period, usually by the emperor. Republican contiones were often held in connection with elections or criminal trials. They were a means of imparting news to the assembled crowd, and of testing the popularity of the speaker and his stance. The contio audience could verbally express assent or dissent but normally only those invited by the presiding magistrate could give a speech. Military contiones were convened by those with military authority for an audience of soldiers on topics relating to army life. The shouted support for a general by the soldiers at a military contio could count as an acclamation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Ancient HistorySame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207