MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract P4-03-08: Mechanisms of CD8+ T cell immunosuppression in triple negative breast cancer

2017· article· en· W4240295576 on OpenAlexaff
Tina Gruosso, M Gigoux, Nicholas Bertos, Dongmei Zuo, Venkata Manem, Anne Monette, R Lapointe, Bejamin Haibe-Kains, M Park

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerStromal cellCytotoxic T cellCD8Cancer researchEstrogen receptorStromaBreast cancerT cellImmune systemTumor microenvironmentMedicineCancerBiologyPathologyImmunologyInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined as tumors lacking expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), are especially difficult to treat effectively. While ER+ and HER2+ breast cancer subtypes can be treated with Tamoxifen and Herceptin, respectively, there are no targeted therapies for TNBC patients. Furthermore, while only 20-30% of TNBC patients respond to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, overall outcome remains poor for non-responding patients. However, mounting evidence suggests that immune-checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies may be especially promising for TNBC patients. We and others have shown that the presence of CD8+ T cells, a crucial component of the cytotoxic arm of the adaptive immune response, is a sign of good clinical outcome in TNBC patients. However, good outcome only correlates with CD8 +T cell invasion of the tumor parenchyma. Some patients had an accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the surrounding tumor-associated stroma, but not the tumor epithelia, and these patients responded as poorly as patients with no CD8 T cells at all. Yet how cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), the dominant cell type of the tumor-associated stroma, affects CD8+ T cell invasion into the tumor epithelia is still poorly understood. To identify potential stroma-dependent mechanisms which potentiate or inhibit CD8+ T cells invasion into the tumor epithelia, we performed gene expression profiling of laser-capture microdissected tumor-associated stroma (and matched epithelia) from 38 TNBC cases. Here we identify several stromal and epithelial canonical pathways as well as biomarkers that are associated with and may explain the accumulation of CD8 T cells outside of the tumor epithelia. Citation Format: Gruosso T, Gigoux M, Bertos N, Zuo D, Manem V, Monette A, Lapointe R, Haibe-Kains B, Park M. Mechanisms of CD8+ T cell immunosuppression in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→