Pour une politique de rapprochement entre les peuples autochtones et les nouveaux arrivants francophones à Edmonton (Alberta)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’appuyant sur des données qualitatives recueillies à Edmonton entre avril 2011 et mars 2012 auprès de participants autochtones et d’immigrants africains francophones à Edmonton, cet article cherche à comprendre comment les nouveaux immigrants francophones interagissent avec les peuples autochtones, deux groupes perçus par la société dominante comme des groupes marginalisés. Les résultats de notre étude exploratoire montrent un tableau contrasté des perceptions que les uns ont des autres. Bien que l’étude révèle des malentendus et des incompréhensions de part et d’autre, les participants reconnaissent l’importance de développer des solidarités, afin de faciliter l’ouverture et le dialogue dans une grande ville comme Edmonton. Pour les participants, la construction de ces ponts mènerait vers un Canada nouveau et plus inclusif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".