MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240302529 · doi:10.24124/2015/bpgub1041

Strong Along-Channel Winds on the Coast of British Columbia: Synoptic Climatology and Case Studies.

2015· dissertation· en· W4240302529 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Talaat Bakri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationDamascus UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsOutflowTrough (economics)ClimatologySynoptic scale meteorologyDew pointPressure gradientChannel (broadcasting)Hydraulic jumpGeologyOceanographyAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceGeographyMeteorologyFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strong along-channel winds on the coast o f British Columbia have been investigated at several locations.Large-scale (synoptic-scale) atmospheric situations have been determined for different types of the along-channel winds that blow up and down channels throughout different seasons.Wintertime outflow winds are associated with a sea-level high-pressure area over the interior o f British Columbia caused by an arctic air mass.Wintertime inflows are caused by sea level lowpressure systems that advance toward the coast of British Columbia.Summertime inflows are initiated by a frontal passage or an inland thermal trough.Case studies at Howe Sound are provided utilizing a period of intensive observations.Inflows (outflows) are accompanied by higher (lower) temperature and dew point and caused by an along-channel pressure gradient pointed inland (toward the coast).An outflow case shows potential hydraulic features, and the vertical structures o f two cases indicate a lower gap flow layer within 1-2 km height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→