MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240320949 · doi:10.1353/bcc.2012.0624

Safekeeping (review)

2012· article· en· W4240320949 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)State (computer science)Media studiesHistorySociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Safekeeping Claire Gross Hesse, Karen . Safekeeping; written and illus. with photographs by Karen Hesse. Feiwel, 2012. [304p]. ISBN 978-1-250-01134-3 $17.99 Reviewed from galleys R Gr. 7-10. When news arrives that the president has been assassinated, seventeen-year-old Radley, who's been volunteering at an orphanage in Haiti, hops a plane back to the States out of worry for her parents. Upon landing in New Hampshire, she finds that her cell and credit cards don't work and that she's forbidden to cross state lines without papers; she walks home to Vermont, dumpster-diving for food and hiding from passing vehicles, only to discover her family home empty, with no hint of where her parents may have gone. She keeps walking, heading north to Canada, on the road meeting up with Celia, a wounded young woman who reluctantly accepts Radley's companionship. After days of grueling travel and a harrowing border-jump into Canada, they make a home together out of an abandoned schoolhouse and wait to see what happens next. Hesse keeps the reader in suspense about the state of the country by means of Radley's limited perspective, doling out nuggets of information about the American People's Party, its rise to power, and the post-assassination riots; these rare glimpses make a sometimes frustratingly vague backdrop to Radley's story, but the survival elements are still compelling. The realistic treatment of the experiences of ordinary people in suddenly harsh circumstances makes for an absorbing character study, and the tale is suffused with an understated sadness and a vivid sense of place. The book is punctuated with black and white snapshots that play with light, shadow, and distance, effectively capture the forested isolation of the road and the beauty and simplicity that coexists with fear in this new life. Copyright © 2012 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.091

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's BooksSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207