MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240330646 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.6370

Dialogismo

2013· article· en· W4240330646 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Faïta

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inseparable del concepto de dialogo (etimológicamente diálogos: intercambio entre personas), la noción de dialogismo se refiere en su acepción primitiva retórica, al arte dialógico que consiste en presentar en forma de dialogo las ideas o sentimientos adjudicados a personajes. Categoría filosófica de origen platónico, y esto recuerda la mayéutica socrática, al dialogo se le concibe como la alternancia entre los personajes, la intención de significar de uno, encontrando la capacidad del otro p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaborealSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207