MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240363213 · doi:10.7202/1062883ar

Conférences Consonances

2012· article· fr· W4240363213 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aurélie Belleville

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesThe RenaissanceArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Renaissance et le Musée des Confluences organisent chaque année un cycle de débats de société. Dérangeants, accessibles, gratuits, troisième saison des Débats Consonances. Les conférenciers et artistes invités confrontent leurs idées avant de laisser place à la discussion avec la salle. Une rencontre entre penseurs et gens de la scène qui partagent avec le public leur désir d’aller au-delà des clichés pour démonter les mécanismes, situer les contextes et les enjeux de la pensée dans l’évolution de la société. Conviviaux, nous vous proposons de prolonger les échanges autour d’un repas commun, au théâtre (sur réservation, 12€). Débats organisés par le Théâtre de la Renaissance, le Musée des Confluences, Sens Public et animés par le philosophe Gérard Wormser. Théâtre de la Renaissance - 6 rue d’Orsel - 69600 OULLINS http://www.theatrelarenaissance.com Les conférences sont retranscrites par Aurélie Belleville.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207