Book Review: The State of Working America, 2006/2007 Lawrence Mishel, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Press, 2006, 440 pp., $59.95 MXN (hardback), $24.95 MXN (paperback). Falling Behind: The State of Working Canada, 2000 Andrew Jackson and David Robinson, with Bob Baldwin and Cindy Wiggins; Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2000, 202 pp., $19.95 (paperback). Work and Labour in Canada: Critical Issues Andrew Jackson; Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 2005, 252 pp., $34.95 (paperback). State of Working in Mexico, 2003 Enrique de la Garza and Carlos Salas, ed. and coordinators; English trans. Web-published by the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, http://www.solidaritycenter.org/content.asp? contentid=506 La Situación del Trabajo en México 2006 Enrique de la Garza and Carlos Salas, ed. and coordinators; México: Plaza y Valdés, 2006, $355.00. Also Web-published at http://www.ietrabajo.org.mx/
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it