MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240408842 · doi:10.3406/ahrf.2004.2702

Napoléon, héritier des rapports entre l'Espagne et la France révolutionnaire (1795-1804)

2004· article· fr· W4240408842 on OpenAlexaff
Lluís Roura i Aulinas

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les rapports entre l'Espagne et la France après la Paix de Bâle se caractérisent par la continuité dans les motivations de fond d'une alliance politique, ainsi que par le maintien de l'attitude hégémonique et interventionniste de la France. Faute d'un véritable plan spécifique pour l'Espagne, la cohérence de la politique de Napoléon se comprend, malgré la complexité des décisions et des intérêts en jeu, plutôt par la trajectoire des rapports entre les deux pays depuis 1795. En outre, la prudence avec laquelle Napoléon prenait ses décisions, l'importance qu'il concédait au fait de disposer d'une information complète et rigoureuse comme élément préalable aux décisions politiques, la soigneuse sélection d' hommes de confiance pour les positions clefs de la diplomatie, de l'armée, ou du pouvoir délégué, n'ont pas empêché une excessive confiance en lui même et la croyance en un certain nombre de clichés sur l'Espagne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207