MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4240420783 · doi:10.4095/291406

Diagenetic study of Tertiary sequences, Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin - Phase 1

2012· report· en· W4240420783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaufort scaleDiagenesisBeaufort seaGeologyOceanographyStructural basinPhase (matter)PaleontologyArcticChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) is involved with a multi-disciplinary study of petroleum systems of the Beaufort-Mackenzie region of Arctic Canada under the Earth Sciences Sector Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) Program. As part of this research, a contracted petrological study of petroleum reservoir quality was undertaken to investigate the post-depositional controls on porosity and permeability of the Tertiary (Paleogene age; 62 - 24 Ma) sedimentary sequences (Aklak, Taglu, Richards and Kugmallit sequences) that host petroleum discoveries in the area. Porosity is important for calculating the volume of petroleum within a reservoir and permeability affects that rate at which petroleum can be produced. Both parameters are critical for evaluating the economic viability of individual petroleum prospects and for assessing the petroleum resource potential of the area. Generally, porosity and permeability are high at the time of sediment deposition but both are reduced by mechanical compaction with increasing sediment burial. As temperature and burial depth increase, diagenetic processes such as mineral dissolution or precipitation (cementation) can further enhance or reduce porosity and permeability. This study focuses on how cementation processes affect reservoir quality and it builds on the previous work of Dr. Volkmar Schmidt which is summarized in GSC Open File 1534. The report is rich in petrographic descriptions and contains many photographic images of rock cores and thin sections used for microscopic examination. These results provide a firm foundation for future studies of the diagenetic evolution of sedimentary successions of the Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin. This study was funded by the former Beaufort-Mackenzie consortium of companies (BP Canada Energy Company, Chevron Canada Limited, ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corporation, Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited, MGM Energy Corporation, and Shell Exploration and Production Company).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→