MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240471901 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14645040.v1

Steady-state modeling and analysis of PWM current source drives

2021· preprint· en· W4240471901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Behrang Azizi Ghanad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRippleControl theory (sociology)Current sourceInductanceWaveformEngineeringCurrent loopVoltage sourcePulse-width modulationInduction motorTorque rippleSteady state (chemistry)VoltageComputer scienceElectrical engineeringDirect torque controlControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current source converter based ac motor drives are increasingly used in medium voltage high power applications due to their simple converter topology, inherent four-quadrant operation, reliable short circuit protection and motor friendly waveforms. The behavior of the current source drive system in the steady state condition is studied in this thesis. The main objective of this investigation is to optimize the dc link inductance, which is one of the most expensive components of the drive system. The first research focus of this thesis is to model the current source drive system in steady state condition. Different parts of the drive system such as the induction motor, mechanical load and the complicated field oriented control (FOC) scheme are simplified for the steady state operation mode. This model has two main features: 1) substantially reduced simulation time, and 2) simplified control loop design without any control parameter tuning and control instability problem. Secondly, the characteristic of the dc link circuit is investigated using the developed steady state drive system model in MATLAB Simulink. The effect of the cd link inductance on the input LC resonant frequency is studied. The value of the dc current ripple is calculated under different conditions, and the effects of different system parameters on the ripple value is investigated. Furthermore, a user-friendly simulation software is developed for the dc choke optimization. Experiments are conducted on a low-voltage (30hp, 480V) current source drive system test setup at Rockwell Automation Canada, with which the developed simulation model is verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207