MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240536570 · doi:10.1079/dmpd/20046500336

<i>Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae</i> . [Distribution map].

2008· article· en· W4240536570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CAB International UK

Bibliographic record

VenueDistribution Maps of Plant Diseases · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyDistribution (mathematics)TanzaniaEnvironmental protectionSocioeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae van Hall. Hosts: Various. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Africa, Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Morocco, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda, Asia, China, India, Madras, Simla, Iran, Israel, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, USSR, Georgia, Kirghizstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Australasia & Oceania, Australia, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia, Tasmania, Northern Territory, New Zealand, Europe, Belgium, Britain & Northetn Ireland, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Irish Republic, Italy, sicily, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, USSR, Ukraine, Crimea, Moldavia, Azerbaijan, Yugoslavia, North America, Canada, Alberta, Manitoba, ont, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Quebec, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, Mexico, USA, Alaska, Central America & West Indies, Antilles, Barbados, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Puerto Rico, South America, Argentina, Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Distrito Federal, Parana, Chile, Uruguay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.109

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDistribution Maps of Plant DiseasesSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207