SIG 7 Perspectives Vol. 18, No. 1, October 2011
Bibliographic record
Abstract
You have accessPerspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its InstrumentationCE Questions1 Oct 2011SIG 7 Perspectives Vol. 18, No. 1, October 2011Earn 0.3 CEUs on This Issue Nerina A. Scarinci, Louise M. Hickson, and Linda E. Worrall Nerina A. Scarinci Google Scholar More articles by this author , Louise M. Hickson Google Scholar More articles by this author and Linda E. Worrall Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/arii18.1.1-ce SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Scarinci, Hickson & Worrall: Third Party Disability in Spouses of Older People With Hearing Impairment 1. Using the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) model to describe third-party disability, it is proposed that the partner's hearing disability serves as an environmental factor for the spouse that then results in the spouse's third party disability. a personal factor for the spouse that then results in the spouse's third party disability. an impairment that then results in the spouse's third party disability. a participation restriction that then results in the spouse's third party disability. 2. Third party disability in spouses of older people with hearing impairment is best described by which of the following ICF components? Body functions and structures Activities and participation Personal factors Environmental factors 3. The Significant Other Scale for Hearing Disability (SOS-HEAR) is a tool that can be used to assess the disability experienced by older people with hearing impairment in their day to day life. the activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by people with hearing impairment. the third party disability experienced by spouses of older people with hearing impairment. the third party disability experienced by family members as a result of their significant others hearing impairment. 4. In a study examining the degree of third-party disability experienced by spouses of older people with hearing impairment, the majority of spouses experienced mild third-party disability. mild-moderate third-party disability. moderate third-party disability. severe third-party disability. 5. The primary aim of audiologic rehabilitation for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others is to improve the older person's hearing so their significant other is not affected by communication difficulties. to reduce the activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by the couple as a result of communication difficulties. to encourage the older person to wear a hearing aid. to encourage the older person to make use of assistance listening devices to improve their hearing and communication. Hogan, Reynolds & O’Brien: Towards a Social Psychology of Living With Acquired Hearing Loss 6. The most common psychosocial issue facing people with acquired hearing loss is depression anxiety fear of stigmatization paranoia 7. Social facts become evident when people negatively sanction the way a person behaves in a given social setting. there is scientific evidence to prove their existence. people make others do things their way. you cannot show that social facts exist. 8. In social psychology, social identity is the same as personal identity. is how other people in the community perceive an individual. is how people perceive themselves in terms of their membership in social groups. is how individuals would like others to perceive them. 9. The Montreal Model of Hearing Help is primarily designed to enable clients to overcome the problems of paranoia and depression. social isolation and exclusion. denying their hearing loss. stigmatization, reluctance and misperception. 10. A distinguishing feature of the Montreal Model of Hearing Help is that it uses group work rather than one-to-one service delivery. it addresses psychosocial barriers to accepting hearing loss. it is a more interesting way to provide hearing rehabilitation. it provides a more efficient means of rehabilitating clients. Tucker, Compton, Mankoff & Rulison: Cochlear Implant Connections: A Biopsychosocial Audiologic Rehabilitation Program for Late Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants 11. Traditional AR approaches typically focus on which one of the following aspects? Reacquisition of speech discrimination abilities Maintaining speech discrimination equilibrium in adjusting to hearing loss Reacquisition of speech production abilities Establishing a client's ability to care for his/her hearing device 12. Which of the components listed below does the biopsychosocial framework of the CIC AR model facilitate? Instruction, perceptual training, and support/counseling Auditory closure, speech discrimination, and identification of phonemes Peer support, self-efficacy, and cognitive behavioral change Device components, mappings, and medical conditions leading to hearing loss 13. The main purpose of the “Roses and Thorns” journal sharing activity is to provide opportunity to practice acoustic highlighting. help clients to improve their speech discrimination abilities. improve clients’ written communication skills. help clients to recognize common challenges and promote mutual problem solving. 14. Which of the following is NOT an emergent variable observed from clients’ narratives in CIC group therapy sessions? Anger Hope Isolation Disillusionment 15. In order to address the biopsychosocial connection between an LDA and his/her support cochlear implant, hearing professionals need to ask questions concerning an LDA's education level, ability to pay for services, and prior knowledge of hearing loss. speech discrimination score, fine motor skills, and knowledge of the auditory system. articulation accuracy, central auditory processing performance, and vocabulary complexity. quality of life, self-efficacy, and hopefulness. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 18 Issue 1 October 2011 Pages: C1-C3 History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2011 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2011 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".