MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Web 2.0 and the News

2011· other· en· W4240547232 on OpenAlexaff
Alfred Hermida

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Communication · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractivityWorld Wide WebComputer scienceThe InternetWeb 2.0Web developmentWeb navigationDynamic web pageWeb modelingSet (abstract data type)Web applicationArchitectureWeb standardsMultimediaWeb page

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Web 2.0 is a term → Internet entrepreneur Tim O'Reilly popularized to describe a stage in the development of the world wide web as a platform. It refers to a set of technical changes that allow technically unskilled users to have dynamic interactions on the web, facilitating a broad range of activities in the creation, dissemination, and sharing of digital content. Web 2.0, as an architecture of participation (O'Reilly 2005), frames users as collaborating in the production, shaping, and distribution of → news and → information, rather than passively consuming content that others create (→ Computer–User Interaction; Interactivity, Concept of).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of CommunicationSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207