Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cardinal laboratory/pathological features of Sjögren syndrome (SS) are autoantibodies (anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB) and lymphocytic infiltrate of the salivary glands. The lymphocytic infiltrate is graded by the focus score (FS)1, 2, which is the number of foci with ≥ 50 lymphocytes per 4 mm2. Much has been published about the clinical and laboratory differences found among Sjögren patients with and without autoantibodies, with the presence of anti-Ro generally associated with more severe disease2,3. However, comparatively few studies have been directed at subjects without a salivary gland lymphocytic infiltrate. Both we4 and Carubbi, et al 5 have compared primary SS patients with an FS of zero (FS = 0) to those patients with a FS ≥ 1. As noted by Carubbi and Alunno6, these 2 studies have fundamental differences. Ours is a cross-sectional … Address correspondence to Dr. R.H. Scofield, 732 NE 18th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. Email: hal-scofield{at}omrf.ouhsc.edu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".