MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240560833 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11323

Signal Enhancement Applied to Pulse Transit Time Measurement

2016· dissertation· en· W4240560833 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaochuan He

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureCuffHilbert–Huang transformPulse pressureSIGNAL (programming language)Pulse (music)Biomedical engineeringComputer scienceMedicineMathematicsInternal medicineSurgeryComputer visionTelecommunicationsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High arterial blood pressure, or hypertension, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.Conventional noninvasive methods for estimating the arterial blood pressure rely on a brachial cuff that is placed around the upper arm.The cuff is inflated to a pressure that exceeds the systolic blood pressure.The heart pulse is monitored while the cuff is slowly deflated.The pressure at which the heart pulse sound can be detected corresponds to the systolic pressure and the pressure at which the heart pulse sound can no longer be detected corresponds to the diastolic pressure.This approach cannot be used on a continuous basis and has many disadvantages, including the fact that the system is cumbersome and causes discomfort to the patient, which may affect their blood pressure value.This thesis proposes two approaches to accurately measure the pulse transit time (PTT).The PTT can be used to estimate arterial blood pressure variations noninvasively, on a continuous basis without the use of a cuff.The correlation between the arterial blood pressure and PTT are verified using bio-signals from the MIMIC II database.The first approach for measuring the PTT relies on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photo-plethysmograph (PPG) signals.Algorithms based on the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method and the adaptive filtering techniques are proposed to enhance the corrupted ECG signal.Gaussian-based curve fitting algorithms are proposed to model and extract the embedded characteristic parameters from the original PPG signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207