MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240581163 · doi:10.1109/iccad.2003.159764

Statistical verification of power grids considering process-induced leakage current variations

2003· article· en· W4240581163 on OpenAlex
Imad A. Ferzli, Farid N. Najm

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICCAD-2003. International Conference on Computer Aided Design (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37486) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeakage (economics)Voltage dropVoltageTransistorElectrical engineeringScalingGridDrop (telecommunication)Exponential functionComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transistor threshold voltages (V/sub th/) have been reduced as part of on-going technology scaling. The smaller V/sub th/ values feature increased variations due to underlying process variations, with a strong within-die component. Correspondingly, given the exponential dependence of leakage on V/sub th/, circuit leakage currents are increasing significantly and have strong within-die statistical variations. With these leakage currents loading the power grid, the grid develops correspondingly large statistical voltage drops. This leakage-induced voltage drop is an unavoidable background level of noise on the grid. Any additional non-leakage currents due to circuit activity will lead to voltage drop which is to be added to this background noise. We propose a technique for checking whether the statistical voltage drop on every node is within user-specified bounds, given user-specified statistics of the leakage currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it