MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240608915 · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8573-9

Annuities and Other Retirement Products

2011· book· en· W4240608915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Bank eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMax-Planck-GesellschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsBusinessActuarial scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessDirections in Development - General1 Feb 2013Annuities and Other Retirement ProductsDesigning the Payout PhaseAuthors/Editors: Roberto Rocha, Dimitri Vittas, and Heinz P. RudolphRoberto Rocha, Dimitri Vittas, and Heinz P. Rudolphhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8573-9AboutView ChaptersPDF (2.3 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract:In the 1990s many emerging economies in Central Europe and Latin America initiated their pension reforms. While most analysis to date has focused on the accumulation phase, there are a number of lessons to be shared as countries start to prepare the retirement options for their contributors, with this book addressing these issues from a public policy perspective. Previous bookNext book FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetailsCited byInsuring longevity risk and long-term care: Bequest, housing and liquidityInsurance: Mathematics and EconomicsInadequacies of regulations on supplementary pension plans in Central and Eastern European countriesEuropean Journal of Social Security, Vol.23, No.330 August 2021Optimal annuitisation in a deterministic financial environmentDecisions in Economics and Finance, Vol.44, No.125 February 2021DEFICIENCIES IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION MARKET IN POLAND FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF REGULATORY POLICYActa Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, Vol.19, No.226 June 2020Annals of Actuarial Science, Vol.14, No.2Developing Coherent Pension Systems: Design Issues for Private Pension Supplements to NDC Schemes24 October 2019Pension Funds with Automatic Enrollment Schemes: Lessons for Emerging Economies6 March 2019New Challenges in Pension Industry: Proposals of Personal Pension Products22 July 2018Designing Pension Systems with Coherent Funded Private Pillars Including Issues for Notional Defined Contribution Schemes6 June 2018Long guarantees with short duration: the rolling annuityScandinavian Actuarial Journal, Vol.2017, No.629 April 2016Measuring Risk-Adjusted Performance and Product Attractiveness of a Life Annuity PortfolioJournal of Mathematical Finance, Vol.07, No.01The interaction of pillars in multi‐pillar pension systems: A comparison of Canada, Denmark, Netherlands and SwedenInternational Social Security Review, Vol.69, No.27 September 2016Guarantee Structures in Life Annuities: A Comparative AnalysisThe Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Vol.41, No.13 June 2015Life Annuities. Products, Guarantees, Basic Actuarial Models.SSRN Electronic JournalPersonal Pensions with Risk Sharing. Affordable, Adequate and Stable Private Pensions in EuropeSSRN Electronic JournalCommensuration and policy comparison: How the use of standardized indicators affects the rankings of pension systemsJournal of European Social Policy, Vol.24, No.122 January 2014Lifecycle Portfolio Choice With Systematic Longevity Risk and Variable Investment—Linked Deferred AnnuitiesJournal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.80, No.314 March 2013PARTICIPATING PAYOUT LIFE ANNUITIES: LESSONS FROM GERMANYASTIN Bulletin, Vol.43, No.218 June 2013Rentensysteme und ihre Reformen auf der ganzen Welt: Ursachen, Trends und HerausforderungenInternationale Revue für Soziale Sicherheit, Vol.66, No.210 June 2013Global pension systems and their reform: Worldwide drivers, trends and challengesInternational Social Security Review, Vol.66, No.29 April 2013Les régimes de retraite dans le monde et leurs réformes: facteurs déterminants, tendances et difficultésRevue internationale de sécurité sociale, Vol.66, No.23 June 2013Sistemas de pensiones en el mundo y sus reformas: factores, tendencias y desafíos mundialesRevista Internacional de Seguridad Social, Vol.66, No.25 June 2013From 'Benefits' to 'Guarantees': Looking at Life Insurance Products in a New FrameworkSSRN Electronic Journal View Published: February 2011ISBN: 978-0-8213-8573-9e-ISBN: 978-0-8213-8574-6 Copyright & Permissions Related TopicsSocial Protections and Labor KeywordsANNUITIESBOND RATEINSURANCE PRODUCTSINSURANCE PROVIDERSLIFE INSURANCEPENSIONPENSION COVERAGERETIREMENTRETIREMENT ASSETSRETIREMENT SAVINGSRETIREMENT SYSTEM PDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it