MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240633669 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.3832

Modelo

2015· article· es· W4240633669 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Aslanides

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Disorders
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a las patologas, a los comportamientos y a sus causas recurre a conocimientos archivados en la memoria del analista que le permiten tener una mirada pre-orientada hacia alguna causalidad "esperada" al momento del diagnstico, aunque este mecanismo cognitivo sea ms o menos consciente para el analista. Incluso los ms fenomenolgicos -que intentan no sesgar el anlisis en base a modelos o preconceptos-recurren a una conceptualizacin mnima, seguramente ms flexible y abierta a la sorpresa que ofrece el terreno de estudio, pero en todo caso que no est ausente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2210.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaborealSame topicPsychological Treatments and DisordersFrench-language works237,207