Transplantation: A Report of Progress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Editors of Transplantation are pleased to publish a special issue of the journal devoted to the World Transplant Congress (WTC) held earlier this year in Boston. This issue includes the keynote speeches from the Congress as well the WTC abstracts that received the highest scores during abstract review and were subsequently accepted by the Editors for publication following peer review. Congratulations to all the authors whose work is published in this issue. This is an exceptional achievement. As the official journal of The Transplantation Society, Transplantation continues both to reflect and educate the transplant community worldwide. This international perspective is one of the many strengths of the journal. Each year, an Editorial Board is carefully reviewed to ensure that leading experts from all over the world are included in the development of the journal. The hard work and dedication of the Editorial Board is highly valued by both the Editors and the publishers. The reasons that leading clinicians and scientists choose Transplantation to submit their work for publication in Transplantation and to read it include: Average of 21 days to first decision on submitted manuscripts. Independent expert peer reviewers and careful Editorial evaluation of each submission. Editorial decisions based on quality of the data and on interest to worldwide transplant community. Editorial offices both in North America and in Europe. International authorship and readership. Two issues per month (average of 22 articles in each issue). Minimum of one distinguished Overview in each issue. Regular publication of topical and controversial Forums. A well-established, highly acclaimed journal with the highest number of citations in the field. A rising impact factor. Proactive publication which highlights new areas within the fields of transplantation, immunobiology, immunogenetics, and molecular biology pertaining to both experimental and clinical developments. Supports The Transplantation Society by providing free online access to the journal to all members and by funding a TTS Research Fellowship. Articles available on the web before publication. Costs to authors for publication of color figures recently reduced. The leading edge “Editorials and Perspectives” section of the journal has been highly successful. This section includes at least one Overview per issue along with forums, analyses and commentaries, and general special features. Transplantation has published a series of special features including the history of The Transplantation Society on its 40th anniversary, the Vancouver Forum on the care of the live organ donor, a discussion of The Global Alliance, a commentary on the World Health Organization Resolution on Human Organ and Tissue Transplantation, and several Cochrane Reviews. The Editors welcome the continued ideas and proposals from readers of the journal. We also appreciate the stimulating comments we receive on published articles. We intend to publicize articles that are particularly topical by issuing appropriate press releases to the world media. Copies of these releases will be uploaded onto The Transplantation Society website. To view these releases and the contents of upcoming issues of the journal, simply click on “More Info” below the journal cover on the right-hand side of The Society’s home page, www.transplantation-soc.org. Online access to Transplantation is free to all members of The Transplantation Society. The Editors would like to express their thanks to those who contributed to this special issue of Transplantation dedicated to the WTC and to all those who have played a role in the very successful year enjoyed by the journal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.038 | 0.054 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".