MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single Fathers

2016· other· en· W4240733921 on OpenAlex
Andrea Doucet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Family Studies · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohabitationScholarshipSingle mothersMarital statusSingle parentPsychologyGender studiesDemographic economicsSociologyDevelopmental psychologyDemographyPolitical scienceLawEconomicsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Since the early 1990s, the numbers of single fathers has slowly and consistently increased in many western countries, including the United States and Canada. In this field of scholarship and research, there is some debate about the meanings and the everyday practices of “single fathers” and how these differ from, or are similar to, those of “single mothers.” This entry defines and explores the concept of the “single father” in broad terms within increasingly diverse family forms and discusses single fathers who vary in their marital status, cohabitation status, and resident status; these include fathers who have sole custody or joint custody, noncustodial fathers, widowed or unmarried fathers, and men who are residential or nonresidential single fathers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it