MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240770532 · doi:10.29085/9781783300808.008

Using digital media in early years library services

2015· book-chapter· en· W4240770532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFacet eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital libraryDigital mediaWorld Wide WebWork (physics)MultimediaDigital divideLibrary scienceInternet privacyComputer scienceSociologyEngineeringInformation and Communications TechnologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter will focus specifically on the role of early years library work in the digital age. Digital media is now ubiquitous in the developed world. While the ‘digital divide’ remains glaringly apparent between society's most affluent and most underprivileged (Neuman and Celano, 2012), the wide availability of digital technology means that more and more children across a range of socio-economic and cultural groups now have access to digital tools in their daily lives with their families. How and why does this concern early years library staff? Simply put, just as libraries provide guidance about and free access to books and older-format audiovisual materials, so too should libraries provide guidance about and access to a range of digital resources from which families and the caregivers of young children can select what best suits their needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it