MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240838532 · doi:10.25071/2561-5467.604

From Very Small to Not Quite So Small: Voyages in Small Sailing Boats

2001· article· en· W4240838532 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Geoffrey H. Farmer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMaritime Security and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeronauticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title for this review essay might also be the prayer uttered by any sailor who has ventured in a small boat beyond the sight of land: "Dear God, be good to me; the sea is so wide and my boat is so small." As they say, there is more than one way to skin a cat, although I cannot for the life of me imagine why anyone would want to do such a thing, and I also have no idea why the saying arose. But it does seem to be appropriate in discussing these three books. They are authored by Frank Dye, the consummate English minimalist who dodges along the shores of North America and the Great Lakes in his sixteen-foot sloop Wanderer, the Irishman, Dermot O'Neill, who ventures forth from Kinsale to satisfy a dream of sailing solo across the Atlantic in his twenty-six-foot sloop Poitn; and the Dutch immigrant, Jerry Heutink, who, after completing the construction of Trillium II, a forty-six foot catamaran, sets off from Penetanguishene, Ontario, to sail the seven seas, identified by Heutink as the Atlantic, the North Sea, the Baltic, the Mediterranean, the Caribbean, the Indian, and the Red Sea"These are three quite different books in many ways, but have in common the theme of sailing and satisfying an underlying dream to venture forth in a small boat to sail the questing sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nordSame topicMaritime Security and HistoryFrench-language works237,207