MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4240853619 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1999.842777

Study of light collection in multi-crystal detectors

2003· article· en· W4240853619 on OpenAlexaff
A. Saoudi, C.M. Pepin, R. Lecomte

Bibliographic record

Venue1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsPhotodetectorDetectorWavelengthScintillatorMaterials scienceRefractive indexOptoelectronicsReflector (photography)Crystal (programming language)PhysicsLight source

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phoswich detectors are currently being considered by a number of investigators for depth-of-interaction measurement in PET and multi-modality emission/transmission imaging. Many parameters affect light collection and S/N ratio from such detectors, made of crystals having different emission wavelength, refractive index and light output. Experiments and simulation with DETECT97 have shown that light collection efficiency and energy resolution degrade steadily with distance from photodetector, mainly as a result of additional crystal interfaces. Simulation indicates that ground surfaces and high reflectivity diffuse reflector maximize light output. Measurements Lend to show that similar results are obtained with polished surfaces due to the presence of crystal defects. An excitation band at 400 nm in GSO is found to absorb a fraction of the light from scintillators emitting at short wavelengths, such as LSO. This effect is more significant for photodetectors such as PMTs that have their maximum sensitivity in the 400-nm range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019)Same topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207