The ultrastructure of glands and the production and function of the secretion in the adhesive capture apparatus of<i>Stenus</i>species (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The elongated labium of rove beetles of the genus Stenus forms an adhesive capture apparatus that enables them to catch fast-fleeing prey such as Collembola. The adhesion is mediated by a secretion produced in glands within the head capsule and secreted onto the paraglossae. Transmission electron microscopy has revealed that these "adhesive glands" are composed of discrete gland units, each consisting of three cells. Two cells are secretorily active, each producing a different secretion, one proteinaceous and the other lipoid. Consequently, a two-phase secretion can be found on the surface of the paraglossae. Adhesive glands and normal epidermal glands share several characteristics and are therefore considered to be homologous. Structural differences can be functionally interpreted. The long glandular ductules themselves serve as a reservoir for the secretion before it is expressed prior to the predatory strike. Van der Waals forces and both the surface tension and the viscosity of the adhesive secretion are discussed as possible mechanisms of adhesion. The adhesion resulting from the viscosity of the fluid is the strongest and exceeds the force theoretically required for catching collemboles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".