Development of Full-scale Sizing Criteria from Tertiary Pilot Testing Results to Achieve Ultra-low Phosphorus Limits at Innisfil, Ontario
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of Full-scale Sizing Criteria from Tertiary Pilot Testing Results to Achieve Ultra-low Phosphorus Limits at Innisfil, OntarioThe Town of Innisfil, Ontario, is served by the Lakeshore Water Pollution Control Plant (LWPCP) which has a rated capacity of 14,370 m3/d and a current average flow of about 9,000 m3/d. The plant uses an extended aeration activated sludge system followed by filters. Alum is added to the aeration basin effluent mixed liquor to reduce the effluent total phosphorus (TP) concentration to approximately...Author(s)Christine deBarbadilloGrant ShellswellWes CyrBrian EdwardsRichard WaiteBikram SabherwalJoe MullanReid MitchellSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSubjectSession 14: Focused Discussion: Phosphorus Removal to Very Low LevelsDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Jan, 2011ISSN1938-6478SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:1L.987;1-DOI10.2175/193864711802867153Volume / Issue2011 / 1Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery SymposiumFirst / last page(s)987 - 1008Copyright2011Word count164Subject keywordsUltra-low phosphorus limitstertiary phosphorus removaldesign criteriamembrane filtrationballasted flocculationseries filtration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it