Formation and Structure of Lyotropic Liquid Crystalline Mesophases in Donor–Acceptor Semiconducting Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Controlling crystallinity and molecular packing at nano- and macroscopic length scales in conjugated polymer thin films is vital for improving the performance of polymer-based electronic devices. Herein, the inherent amphiphilicity of rigid donor–acceptor copolymers used in high performance polymer electronics is leveraged to allow the formation of highly ordered lyotropic mesophases. By increasing the length and branching of solubilizing chains on cyclopentadithiophene- alt -thiadiazolopyridine-based alternating copolymers, amphiphilicity can be increased, and lyotropic liquid crystalline mesophases are observed in selective solvents. These lyotropic mesophases consist of chain extended polymers exhibiting close, ordered π-stacking. This is evidenced by birefringent solutions and red-shifted absorbance spectra displaying pronounced excitonic coupling. Crystallinity developed in solution can be transferred to the solid state, and thin films of donor–acceptor copolymers cast from lyotropic solutions exhibit improved crystalline order in both the alkyl and π-stacking directions. Because of this improved crystallinity, transistors with active layers cast from lyotropic solutions exhibit a significant improvement in carrier mobility compared to those cast from isotropic solution, reaching a maximum value of 0.61 cm 2 V –1 s –1 . This approach of rational side chain design bridges the gap from solution structure to solid state structure and is a promising and general approach to allow the expression of lyotropic mesophases in rigid conjugated polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".