Rapid quantification of Psilocybin with reversed-phase HPLC and single-wavelength detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The alkaloid psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine) and the neurologically active psilocin (4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine) are the foremost compounds of pharmaceutical interest in Psilocybe mushrooms. As these compounds are infrequently analyzed in analytical labs, validated methods for rapid purity analysis are lacking. Newfound therapeutic use has invigorated academic and commercial interests in the molecules and new methods of production and available products are expanding. As a result, high-throughput methods of analysis for psilocybin must be improved to promptly determine chemical differences between mushroom genera or other sources of psilocybin and psilocin, as well as refined product purity. To address this, we developed an inexpensive HPLC technique for the efficient quantification of psilocybin and psilocin by using readily available equipment and dilute reagents. Aqueous ammonium formate (0.143 mM) was found to be preferable over techniques with much higher buffer concentrations or stronger acids for controlling psilocybin Zwitterion resolution. The chromatographic run time satisfied high-throughput analytical requirements with an efficient total runtime under 2 minutes. A standard octadecyl silica (C18) column provided excellent resolution between psilocybin and psilocin signals. The quality of the method was validated using certified analytical reference standards and was found to be accurate (3.5% bias, Psilocybin), reliable (0.32% RSD), and efficient (Psilocybin k’ = 1.78).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".