MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241019067 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2010.5517700

Electronically tunable diplexer for frequency-agile transceiver front-end

2010· article· en· W4241019067 on OpenAlexaff
Érick Emmanuel Djoumessi, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

Venue2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplexerVaricapPassbandBand-pass filterInsertion lossMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsDiodeIntermodulationReturn lossCapacitanceDuplexerTransceiverElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPhysicsOpticsAmplifierEngineeringElectrodeCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A varactor-based tunable diplexer is proposed and experimentally validated for IEEE802.16 standard-based system applications. The proposed transmit/receive (Tx/Rx) diplexer consists of two tunable dual-mode bandpass filters. Size reduction and band tunability are achieved by using the capacitance of varactors diodes. With two-tone nonlinear characterization test, the diplexer (with higher biased voltage) is found to introduce, in Tx frequency band, a high level of intermodulation product (IIP3). A better insertion loss in passbands is observed for a lower room temperature. Measured insertion loss of our fabricated diplexer is obtained between 5.3 to 2.89 dB and 5.2 to 3.7 dB over the tuning frequency range for the Tx and Rx channels filters bands, respectively. Both filters exhibit better than 40 dB rejection in the passband of its counterpart. The varactors diodes attached to both filters allow 24.5% and 23.3% center-frequency tunability in Tx and Rx filters bands, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave SymposiumSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207