MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241032110 · doi:10.4018/9781591401841.ch006

Understanding the Mobile Consumer

2011· book-chapter· en· W4241032110 on OpenAlexaff
Constantinos K. Coursaris, Khaled Hassanein, Milena Head

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Innovation in Industries
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent surge of interest in mobile commerce (m-commerce) is fueled by consumer interest in being able to access business services or to communicate with other consumers anytime and anywhere. It is also motivated by the interest of the business community to extend their reach to customers at all times and all places. Businesses that aspire to succeed in this market must have a deep understanding of the interests and concerns of the mobile consumers in using wireless applications. With this in mind, this chapter provides an analysis of this emerging market from a consumer’s perspective. A consumer-centric m-commerce model outlining the various wireless interaction modes of the mobile consumer (m-consumer) is presented, followed by a discussion of the needs and concerns of the m-consumer. An m-commerce value network is then presented, outlining the roles of the different players within this industry. The various business applications developed to address m-consumer needs are then presented. Finally, a global m-commerce market overview is provided, and some future trends are outlined.Request access from your librarian to read this chapter's full text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.012
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicDigital Innovation in IndustriesFrench-language works237,207