MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241041084 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14644569.v1

Frequency calibration of the system clock of passive wireless microsystems

2021· preprint· en· W4241041084 on OpenAlexafffund
Durand Jarrett-Amor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsRelaxation oscillatorElectronic engineeringClock rateMicrosystemLocal oscillatorCalibrationFrequency driftCapacitorComputer scienceCMOSVoltage-controlled oscillatorElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsVoltagePhase noiseMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents a theoretical and simulated study of frequency calibration of the system clock of passive wireless microsystems. The proposed frequency calibration technique achieves ultra-low power, high fre- quency accuracy, and fast calibration of the frequency of a local oscillator in a passive wireless microsystem using a frequency-locked loop (FLL). A new integrating frequency dif- ference detector (iFDD) that senses the frequency difference between the local oscillator and a reference clock is also proposed. The iFDD is implemented using a switched-capacitor network with two integrating paths. The FLL is composed of a logic-control block for gen- eration of clock signals, the iFDD, and a relaxation voltage-controlled oscillator. A detailed analysis of the characteristics of the iFDD in the time and frequency domains is presented. The loop dynamics of the FLL is also investigated. The proposed FLL is implemented in IBM 0.13-µm, 1.2 V CMOS technology and is validated through simulations using Spectre APS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207